.jpg "When Disruption Backfires: How Tech Platforms Are Failing Customers and Small Businesses Alike")
There was a time when we all had a go-to person for everything — a trusted local taxi driver, the electrician who knew your house, the restaurant that recognized your voice on the phone. These were relationships built on trust, familiarity, and accountability.
Then came the wave of “tech-enabled” startups promising to organise the unorganised — giving us convenience at our fingertips. And at first, it worked. The apps were fast, efficient, and (mostly) reliable. But over time, something changed.
Today, as we look back at how these platforms have evolved, one uncomfortable truth stands out: many of them are now part of the problem they were meant to solve.
Taxi Industry: A Case Study in Broken Promises
Before Ola and Uber, your local taxi guy showed up on time, gave you a fair deal, and knew the routes. With the arrival of ride-hailing apps, that personal layer disappeared.
At first, we celebrated the convenience.
But soon came surge pricing, cancelled rides, distracted drivers juggling multiple apps, and deteriorating vehicle quality.
Drivers too began to suffer — high commissions, falling earnings, and lack of control over their own business.
When a cleaner alternative like BluSmart came along, it gave people hope. But it, too, struggled to survive at scale — eventually shutting down many services.
Who loses in the end?
Both the customer, who now has few reliable choices, and the independent driver, who lost his own customer base and control over pricing.
A Pattern Repeating Across Industries
This isn’t just about taxis. The same playbook has unfolded in:
🧰 Home Services
Platforms like Urban Company replaced local plumbers and electricians with a promise of professionalism. But today, customers routinely face misdiagnoses, overpriced services, and poor after-sales support. Meanwhile, many skilled technicians are underpaid, overworked, and treated as easily replaceable.
🍽️ Food Delivery
Swiggy and Zomato made food delivery easy — but also squeezed restaurant margins, trained customers to expect deep discounts, and turned loyal diners into impatient app users. Small restaurants now struggle to survive outside the app ecosystem.
🛵 Hyperlocal Deliveries
From Dunzo to Zepto, quick commerce changed consumer behavior, but at what cost? Gig workers race against the clock for pennies, while consumers are conditioned to expect convenience without question.
What Gets Lost in the Race to Scale
As these platforms grow, something human is lost:
Trust is replaced by transaction.
Long-term relationships are replaced by one-time ratings.
Ownership gives way to control by algorithms.
Small businesses, once pillars of community ecosystems, are left with no real footing. They either join the platform on exploitative terms or slowly fade away.
Customers, ironically, are no longer treated like humans either — just data points in a CRM, whose problems are routed through bots and FAQs.
Where Do We Go From Here?
We’re not arguing against technology. But the way it's being applied in these industries needs a reset — one that prioritises:
Fairness for service providers
Transparency for customers
Accountability from platforms
And most importantly, room for local businesses to thrive alongside tech, not get swallowed by it.
The Missing Safety Net: What About Legal Recourse?
When these platforms fail to deliver — through poor service, misdiagnosis, unfair billing, or dishonored warranties — where does the consumer go?
Technically, there’s a route: India's consumer protection laws, grievance portals, and consumer courts. But in reality?
Filing a complaint is often time-consuming, poorly digitized, and lacks follow-through.
Legal resolution may take months or even years — for a refund of ₹3,000 or ₹5,000, is it worth it?
The process favors the platform, not the individual — they have legal teams, you have frustration and lost time.
So most customers just give up. They tolerate poor service, lose money, and move on.
This absence of quick, fair resolution emboldens platforms — because the cost of disappointing a customer is low, and the risk of accountability even lower.
Who’s Losing the Most?
Customers, who are promised convenience but are trapped in cycles of poor service, app-based dead ends, and impersonal support.
Small business owners, who once built their brand on trust but now play by the platform’s rulebook — often at a loss.
Gig workers, who were sold dreams of entrepreneurship but now operate in high-pressure, low-control environments.
And in the middle of all this, the legal system provides no real deterrent or safety net.
What Needs to Change?
Fast-track, tech-enabled consumer grievance redressal mechanisms — with real enforcement powers.
Regulations for platforms that ensure fair treatment of both consumers and service providers.
Public awareness of the hidden costs of convenience — and the importance of demanding accountability.
Final Thought
Disruption isn't progress if it degrades quality, trust, and livelihoods.
Maybe it's time we, as consumers, ask more questions.
Maybe it's time platforms stop hiding behind scale as an excuse for poor service.
And maybe it's time we find ways to rebuild the balance — where technology enables, but doesn’t erase the value of people and relationships.
Related Blogpost:
.jpg)
Comments